THỨ TƯ,NGÀY 22 THÁNG 4, 2020

Shape 5 and you can Table 4 work to have discovering moments for the Lag5

Bởi Nguyễn Hoàng Phong

Cập nhật: 04/07/2022, 12:38

Shape 5 and you can Table 4 work to have discovering moments for the Lag5

Comes from Lag5

At phrase 5, studying minutes for both Topic and you will CNPC countries improve, even so they don’t change from each other (? = , SE = , |t| = step one.16). (Recall you to a main phrase type of feeling would not be interpretable nevertheless). not, we did discover a significant head effectation of demo variety of from the term 5 (? = , SE = , |t| = 1.96), for example Subject and CNPC prime phrases was comprehend significantly slowly than just the target equivalents. There can be zero phrase-by-demo telecommunications at the phrase 5 (? = -, SE = , |t| = 0.91), and thus reading go out differences when considering primes and you may aim was in fact regarding the same magnitude no matter sentence variety of. fifteen

For all other words in the region of interest (w6–w8), we find only a significant effect of sentence type (w6: ? = , SE = , |t| = 3.08; w7: ? = , SE = , |t| = 3.02; w8: ? = , SE = , |t| = 3.08), meaning that Subject islands were read slower than CNPC islands. However, as previously noted, this comparison is not central to the aims of Experiment 2. We also find no main effect of trial https://datingranking.net/pl/faceflow-recenzja/ type (|t|’s < 1.04), meaning that the difference in prime and target reading times observed at word 5 disappeared quickly. Crucially, the sentence-by-trial interaction previously observed in Lag1 was no longer detected from w6–w8. (Despite apparent graphical differences at word 6, the sentence-by-trial interaction is not significant; it approaches marginal significance: ? = , SE = , |t| = 1.614. For all other words, |t|'s < 1.44). At w10 and w11, reading times rise, presumably as a result of sentence-final wrap-up effects.

Once we examine acceptability recommendations inside the Lag5, we discover that CNPC area feedback to possess primes and you can purpose averaged 2.32 and you will 2.thirteen, respectively, when you are Subject isle critiques to have primes and you can objectives averaged 1.96 and you may 1.84, correspondingly. Needless to say, CNPC and you will Topic islands didn’t change from each other (? = -0.13, SE = 0.09, |t| = 1.44); nor did primes and you can objectives (? = 0.07, SE = 0.05, |t| = step one.44). There is certainly zero phrase-by-demo telecommunications (? = -0.03, SE = 0.09, |t| = 0.29).

Dialogue

Try out dos used an online measure – self-paced understanding times – to research perhaps the acceptability score advancements in the Test step 1 had been related to with the-range area operating effects. We checked out toward exposure from reading time advancements, an indication out-of handling facilitation, for CNPC and you will Subject islands whenever primes and needs was romantic along with her (Lag1) of course, if they were further apart (Lag5). Predicated on is a result of Test step one, i predict whenever this new acceptability rating advancements used in CNPC countries (yet not Topic countries) mirrored online control facilitation, we should get a hold of corresponding best-to-target reading day facilitation into the CNPC isles (however Topic islands) into the Check out 2. We along with have a look at whether on line facilitation consequences inside Try 2 was indeed short- or much time-term. In the event the target phrases was read reduced than prime sentences inside the Lag1, not during the Lag5, this will area with the a preliminary-existed priming effect. However if learning times getting needs in Lag1 and you may Lag5 is actually smaller than its primes, this should strongly recommend an extended-long-lasting perception.

Unlike inside the Try step 1, and therefore discover no get advancements to have Subject isles no matter distance ranging from perfect and you can address sentences, Check out 2 discover faster reading times getting address phrases when Subject countries have been split from the singular intervening sentence (Lag1). So it impression endured because of numerous terms and conditions within our area for desire. Whenever phrases were next aside (Lag5), i discover a prime-to-target facilitation local to only one-word in the order of notice. New finding that discovering times to possess target sentences is facilitated of the a preceding finest implies that comprehenders have the ability to build representations out of ungrammatical Subject isles right after which draw into those people representations so you can facilitate later on operating of that same design. To put it differently, Check out 2 signifies that priming is possible in the Topic islands. Moreover, brand new trend away from differences between Lag1 and Lag5 shows that this new version of priming noticed to own Topic isles could be attributed to fast rust from ongoing structural activation. This is just like just what might have been advised to help you make up short-name priming into the grammatical sentences.

Bình luận

Tôn trọng lẫn nhau, hãy giữ cuộc tranh luận một cách văn minh và không đi vượt quá chủ đề chính. Thoải mái được chỉ trích ý kiến nhưng không được chỉ trích cá nhân. Chúng tôi sẽ xóa bình luận nếu nó vi phạm Nguyên tắc cộng đồng của chúng tôi

Chưa có bình luận. Sao bạn không là người đầu tiên bình luận nhỉ?

SEARCH