THỨ TƯ,NGÀY 22 THÁNG 4, 2020

S. people in Congress (MCs) to your public appeal, foreign things, and civil-rights

Bởi Nguyễn Quỳnh Phong

Cập nhật: 30/07/2022, 09:35

S. people in Congress (MCs) to your public appeal, foreign things, and civil-rights

Very early empirical work at the fresh new view–plan connect try sparked inside the highest region by Miller and Stokes’s (1963) “Constituency Influence within the Congress.” Such article authors brought together investigation into the societal preferences by the constituency, and you will both surveys and you can roll-call voting decisions away from U. Correlations ranging from constituency preferences and you can members of Congress’s behavior ideal one to the latter are directed in part of the constituency view. Brand new trying to find is hitting at that time, empirically proving a style out of icon slightly not the same as the brand new party-created performs which had preceded it.

Known as education of dyadic symbol (Weissberg, 1978), brand new literary works with the roll call voting asserts you to definitely icon should be to be found regarding dating anywhere between private constituencies and you will individual agents

This seminal investigation spawned a vast literature seeking to expose website links within voting conclusion off representatives and many mixture of constituency opinion, constituency aggregate demographics, and you may representatives’ very own demographic attributes and you may team affiliations. The analysis is concentrated in america but has been extended to other countries with legislative areas (e.grams., Converse Enter, 1986).

A lot of really works contains aside tall relationships throughout the U.S. House of Representatives and you can Senate (e.g., Wright Berkman, 1986). Accepting important limitations inside the early in the day look depending on correlations, Bafumi and you will Herron (2010) attempt to actually fulfill the finest things off constituencies and representatives when you look at the an analysis of congressional move phone calls. This study relies on broad ideological ranks one include multiple points (or other things), that has a unique limitations, once the Broockman (2016) illustrates in his interesting analysis.

Needless to say, an optimistic dating between thoughts during the districts in addition to roll call votes of the agencies does not mean one to public opinion indeed reasons plan, as it can feel you to policymakers are answering so you’re able to something else, including the same issues that influence public-opinion. Whether or not covariates may help pick the new direction away from causality from inside the observational knowledge, there isn’t any leaking out the new omitted varying(s) problem. Due to the fact is tough to demonstrate causality this kind of knowledge, it is vital that fresh works finds out evidence of causal effects off advice for the representatives’ roll-call voting choices (Butler Nickerson, 2011).

Cumulative Sign

Within the countries rather than geographical constituencies, as in those of us one to allocate legislative chair having fun with proportional symbolization, scholars has actually checked “cumulative symbol”-the newest match ranging from public opinion and the ranks regarding establishments, such as legislatures or professionals. The initial performs of this kind in reality focused on this new United States, where Weissberg (1978) advised collective congressional sign as an option to dyadic image. The importance away from collective sign inside a network one to encourages constituency-level signal is very important: just like the Weissberg indexed, concordance anywhere between private legislators’ methods and constituency needs try a helpful but not sufficient reputation to possess coverage sign; indeed, very individual agencies you certainly will choose against the majority thoughts inside their region and you will, so long as different district needs was indeed mirrored in the ballots regarding other districts’ agencies, rules outcomes you certainly will be representative of your own (national) majority taste.

An abundance of really works just like the enjoys concerned about other countries. Building into the an effective decade’s really works because of the a large number of scholars, Miller et al. (1999) take a look at various size–professional linkages, such as the symbol regarding public opinion. A great amount of relevant search measures up free Heterosexual dating dating public opinion while the ranks of events, and this Dalton ainsi que al. (2011) opinion and you can sum) assesses brand new suits amongst the public’s ideological dispositions and the ones away from governments, attending to particularly into the effects of electoral expertise. Move et al. (2012) and you will Dalton mais aussi al. (2011) assess the ranks of your social, governmental parties, and you will governing bodies and determine their relationship, and acquire extreme contacts. If you find yourself scholars keeps normally checked-out cumulative icon round the area, a great amount of present content studies personality while focusing explicitly on the new positions of manager (elizabeth.grams., Hakhverdian, 2010; Hobolt Klemmensen, 2005; Jennings John, 2009).

Bình luận

Tôn trọng lẫn nhau, hãy giữ cuộc tranh luận một cách văn minh và không đi vượt quá chủ đề chính. Thoải mái được chỉ trích ý kiến nhưng không được chỉ trích cá nhân. Chúng tôi sẽ xóa bình luận nếu nó vi phạm Nguyên tắc cộng đồng của chúng tôi

Chưa có bình luận. Sao bạn không là người đầu tiên bình luận nhỉ?

SEARCH