THỨ TƯ,NGÀY 22 THÁNG 4, 2020

The purpose of convinced inside contradictions isn’t just bad, but not

Bởi Nguyễn Hoàng Phong

Cập nhật: 07/09/2022, 04:48

The purpose of convinced inside contradictions isn’t just bad, but not

It offers a delicate, adaptive vista, particularly, a community who does no more feel riven which have basic antagonisms, thinking that might possibly be eliminate the urge to dominate compliment of abstract identity, and thriving from types of objects inside their particularity. Once the Adorno is actually believing that latest people contains the information to help you relieve the suffering they however perpetuates, his bad dialectics keeps a utopian visited: “Because of one’s tangible odds of haven, dialectics is the ontology of the not the case condition. A right condition could be free of dialectics, don’t program than just paradox” (ND 11). Such an excellent “right updates” was among reconciliation between human beings and character, including the character within people, and certainly one of people by themselves. This notion regarding reconciliation restores Adorno’s reflections towards stability and you may metaphysics.

six. Stability and you can Metaphysics immediately following Auschwitz

Such Adorno’s epistemology, his ethical values comes out-of good materialistic metacritique from German idealism. The new design on “Freedom” when you look at the Negative Dialectics (ND 21199) performs an effective metacritique off Kant’s feedback of basic need. Therefore also, the fresh model towards “World Heart and Absolute History” (ND 30060) provides an excellent metacritique off Hegel’s thinking of the past. Both models on top of that manage good subterranean discussion with the Marxist tradition, and this discussion courses Adorno’s appropriation off both Kantian and you may Hegelian “practical viewpoints.”

The original section from the Introduction so you can Negative Dialectics suggests the newest recommendations Adorno’s appropriation will take (ND 34). There he requires whether or not and just how values is still you’ll be able to. Adorno asks that it from the background away from Karl ously proclaimed that philosophy’s activity is not only to translate the country but to change it. Within the determining his historical materialism throughout the neurological materialism from Ludwig Feuerbach, entally productive and you will governmental bacteria whoever interrelations aren’t merely interpersonal however, public and you can historical. Marx’s focus on development, government, people, and background sites de rencontre par pays gratuits requires their epistemology in a good “pragmatic” recommendations. “Truth” doesn’t mean new conceptual telecommunications between think and reality, ranging from offer and you will facts, he says. Rather, “truth” refers to the economic, governmental, societal, and you can historic fruitfulness away from envision used.

Regardless of if Adorno shares a lot of Marx’s anthropological intuitions, the guy thinks that a twentieth-millennium formula regarding specifics with important fruitfulness got devastating outcomes to your each party of the iron curtain. New Inclusion so you’re able to Bad Dialectics starts by making a couple of says. First, no matter if apparently out-of-date, thinking remains necessary since capitalism hasn’t been overthrown. 2nd, Marx’s interpretation off capitalist people is actually inadequate and his complaints is outmoded. And this, praxis not serves as an adequate cause for problematic (philosophical) idea. Actually, praxis caters to mostly because a beneficial pretext to possess shutting along the theoretic critique one adaptive praxis would want. If you are nevertheless pretending to grasp the complete, opinions doesn’t recognize how carefully this will depend on society given that a whole, completely on the philosophy’s “immanent knowledge” (ND 4). Beliefs must lost such as naivete. It must ask, because the Kant asked about metaphysics after Hume’s feedback away from rationalism, Just how are values still you can? Significantly more especially, How, after the failure out-of Hegelian believe, is values nonetheless you are able to? Just how do the brand new dialectical work to help you conceptualize the brand new nonconceptual-hence Marx also pursued-how can so it thinking be went on?

Which have overlooked once of the conclusion (via the proletarian revolution, centered on early Marx), opinions today have to criticize itself: its public naivete, the intellectual antiquation, its inability to know the benefit of working for the commercial later capitalism

It mind-implicating complaints of loved ones between principle and exercise is certainly one important supply to Adorno’s reflections on the integrity and you may metaphysics. Several other is the catastrophic perception away from 20th-100 years history into the candidates for imagining and having a far more gentle community. Adorno’s try an integrity and you can metaphysics “shortly after Auschwitz” (Bernstein 2001, 371414; Zuidervaart 2007, 4876). Ethically, according to him, Hitler’s barbarism imposes a beneficial “the fresh new categorical imperative” for the people in their condition from unfreedom: therefore to prepare its consider and step that “Auschwitz won’t repeat by itself, [that] absolutely nothing comparable perform occurs” (ND 365). Metaphysically, philosophers need to find over the years compatible ways to mention meaning and facts and you can suffering you to neither refute neither affirm the clear presence of a scene transcendent on one we realize. Whereas doubting it might inhibits this new suffering one phone calls aside to own important alter, straightforwardly affirming the presence of haven create cut off this new feedback of modern area and also the be unable to transform it. The cornerstone to own Adorno’s twice technique is not an invisible ontology, once the particular enjoys advised, but rather a great “speculative” otherwise “metaphysical” feel. Adorno appeals to the experience that thought and therefore “does not decapitate by itself” moves for the notion of a world in which “not simply extant suffering was abolished in addition to suffering one to are irrevocably past is terminated” (403). Neither logical positivist antimetaphysics neither Heideggerian hypermetaphysics does fairness so you can that it experience.

Bình luận

Tôn trọng lẫn nhau, hãy giữ cuộc tranh luận một cách văn minh và không đi vượt quá chủ đề chính. Thoải mái được chỉ trích ý kiến nhưng không được chỉ trích cá nhân. Chúng tôi sẽ xóa bình luận nếu nó vi phạm Nguyên tắc cộng đồng của chúng tôi

Chưa có bình luận. Sao bạn không là người đầu tiên bình luận nhỉ?

SEARCH