MENUMENU
Recall Effort Fails, California https://aix-pression.com/tag/homophonie Gov Gavin Newsom Remains In Office
But they didn’t show up in anything like the numbers it would have taken to overcome Newsom’s early advantage. Even then, the recall would have failed to materialize if California required more than 12 percent of voters to sign the petition — the threshold is 25 percent or higher in other states — or evidence of actual malfeasance. In 2020, at least 14 governors nationwide faced recall efforts. The leading GOP candidates in the race start at a disadvantage in heavily Democratic California, where registered Democrats outnumber GOP voters by nearly 2-to-1. A Republican candidate hasn’t won a statewide race since 2006, when Arnold Schwarzenegger won re-election after gaining office in a recall election. But he’s now shifted into an aggressive campaign strategy, fundraising, running an ad attacking the recall and doing national TV and cable interviews.
As both blue state and red state Governors across the country have shown leadership, responsibility and results in the face of a global pandemic, California has struggled. Gavin Newsom has put politics ahead of science, special interest ahead of students, ambition ahead of safety and his campaign ahead of your personal and economic health. I’m sure most people have seen the viral videos of open, broad-daylight crime in our state. These brazen crimes tell me that some of our policies, even if they are well intentioned, are creating the wrong environment. One that tells criminals they can operate without consequence. That sentiment will rot a society quickly and it must be stopped.
It’s off to prep school for Prince George this September but happily without a tuck box, teddy bear and tearful goodbye. If whispers are to be believed, the third in line to the throne, who turned nine this July, will become a day pupil at Lambrook School in Berkshire, along with his sister, https://aix-pression.com/tag/homophonie Princess Charlotte, seven, and brother, Prince Louis, four. In effect, Newsom reframed the recall as a choice, above all else, between the laissez-faire COVID-19 policies that have failed to contain huge summer surges in Republican-led states across the South and the Golden State’s more careful approach to Delta.
With 62 percent of ballots counted — and more than two-thirds of them saying “no” to the recall — Newsom addressed his supporters in Sacramento. Newsom’s team has worked for months to tie the recall to national Republicans and supporters and operatives of former President Donald Trump, who is broadly unpopular in California outside his GOP base. His recall victory – in which he failed to carry the independent vote, actually lost the “walk-in” tally, and had to outspend the pro-recall campaign literally 100 million to zero – is called decisive and convincing and resounding. There is wiggle room in the law and numerous steps along the way, but if supporters collect sufficient signatures, it’s likely to be in the fall, possibly in November.
And despite sky-high promises by Newsom in 2018 to fix homelessness and build more affordable housing, more people are on the streets and homeownership continues to remain a pipe dream for many Californians. Newsom campaigned on single-payer healthcare three years ago and Democrats in the Assembly could push a bill next year to establish the model in California. Newsom’s campaign framed the recall as a proxy war against Trumpism playing out in a deep-blue state, shifting the focus off Newsom and his own record. But just as wildfires, punishing drought, record homelessness, a housing shortage, a once in a generation pandemic and a learning curve at the Capitol have challenged much of his term in office, Newsom returns to work facing those same problems and more. Republicans last won a statewide election in 2006, when Schwarzenegger was reelected.
The Newsom campaign’s official message to voters had been to vote “no” on the recall and to ignore the replacement question. To have been listed on the ballot as a replacement candidate, a candidate must have been a United States citizen and registered to vote in California, submitted signatures from 65 registered voters and paid a $4,194.94 filing fee . Candidates who had been convicted of a felony involving bribery or embezzlement of public money were not allowed to run. On July 21, 2021, Sacramento County Superior Court Judge Laurie Earl invalidated all tax return disclosure requirements for the 2021 recall election. The ruling was on a suit filed by prospective recall challenger Larry Elder against Secretary of State Weber, alleging she overstepped her authority by disqualifying him from his candidacy due to a purported tax return filing error.
Compared to other states that allow recalls, 12% is a low bar; most other states require roughly double that percentage. While the projected $276 million cost of the recall was close to the $292 million spent on the 2020 general election in California, which was the first to feature universal mail-in ballots, the cost per voter was significantly higher than in the 2018 midterm elections. On July 1, the Department of Finance released an estimate of the cost of the September 14, 2021 election at $276 million, an increase of $61 million from the prior $215 million estimated by county election offices. In 2017, ahead of the successful recall of State Senator Josh Newman (D-Fullerton), Democratic legislators changed the law concerning recall elections with Senate Bill 117 to give voters 30 business days to withdraw their names from the recall petition. The 2017 law change also added a 30 day period for the state Department of Finance to conduct a cost estimate and gave the Joint Legislative Budget Committee 30 days to review the estimate.
Đăng nhập
Đăng ký
SEARCH
Chưa có bình luận. Sao bạn không là người đầu tiên bình luận nhỉ?