MENUMENU
If You Traveled Faster Than Light, Would You Travel Back riviere godbout In Time, And Would Gravity Repel You Instead Of Attract You?
But you’d need more energy than exists in the entire universe to make riviere godbout that happen. Even so, it travels through the gem at over 277 million mph (almost 124,000 km/s) — enough to make a difference, but still incredibly fast. This principle allows astronomers to see the universe as it looked after the Big Bang, which took place about 13.8 billion years ago.
However, for me that would relocate the issue from “why did the universe start with such a low entropy” to “how do Big Bangs produce such a reservoir of low entropy”, or something like that. Though FTL would be hard to deal with numerically as an IVP, as I had mentioned in the other comment. It’s not even hard to see what’s wrong with this argument. Imagine you have a particle that goes right to left backwards in time, what would it look like? It would look like a particle going left to right forward in time. These two descriptions are mathematically just entirely identical.
Physicists around the world are still on the lookout for the exotic matter that they only see an indirect glimpse of very rarely. Exotic matter actually makes up almost 95 percent of our known universe and only 5 percent of all of the matter in our universe are the photons, electrons and atoms that make up our world. NASA may only be one hundred years away from creating a space ship that likens itself to the scientific fantasies of Star Trek, but physicists may never get a full glimpse of the matter- only hints at what it is not. The principles of quantum physics rely on opportunity, hope and potential.
Now if we just get Miguel’s ship in one of these bubbles… Miguel Alcubierre published a theory that says that a warp drive is possible. This theory was special because it did not contradict Einstein’s theories of relativity. According to his theory, a warp drive could happen because of a theoretical propulsion system that looks like a bubble. This system would stretch space time in a wave and cause the fabric of space in front of a space craft to contract, and the space behind it to expand.
The Hartman effect is the tunneling effect through a barrier where the tunneling time tends to a constant for large barriers. This could, for instance, be the gap between two prisms. When the prisms are in contact, the light passes straight through, but when there is a gap, the light is refracted. There is a non-zero probability that the photon will tunnel across the gap rather than follow the refracted path.
Critically, I’ve drawn the time axis for the Proximal Centaurians parallel to our own time. This is because Proxima Centauri is moving at essentially the same velocity as Earth . Thus, there are no big relativistic effects between our counting of time and the Proximal Centaurians. Say you have 4 pairs of entangled matter such that are distinct from and won’t affect , , etc. If y0 changes you know that x0 changed, the same being true for the other pairs.
“Imagine you have a particle that goes right to left backwards in time, what would it look like? It would look like a particle going left to right forward in time.” These two fields, which are themselves 2-spinors, define the Dirac spinor in the Dirac field. In this picture however we see this mass is a sort of potential that scatters the field into its conjugate. The basic point is that dealing with your questions involves which coordinate system you choose to use. His argument is “in FRW there can be no momentum flow.” and that therefore “The fact that the FRW universe cannot admit an electromagnetic field is ignored in standard cosmology texts.”
Re Peter, he wrote “So either relativity is wrong or communicating faster than light is impossible .” I can screw up cause and effect just by transmitting a single bit (for a True/False binary decision) back in time. I could get very rich Sending Tomorrow’s outcomes to myself Today without me physically doing the time travel.
Đăng nhập
Đăng ký
SEARCH
Chưa có bình luận. Sao bạn không là người đầu tiên bình luận nhỉ?